Becoming British, and Swedish

Apparently if you’re an immigrant it costs thousands of pounds and a mountain of paperwork to acquire British citizenship these days. – Just for purposes of comparison: when I got my (dual) Swedish citizenship five years ago it cost me around £50, a few questions about my financial situation and how long I had been with Kajsa, a quick police check, and that was it. No language requirement, even – wrongly, I think, but luckily for me. It took a few months for my application to be processed; but then I was Svensk. (Of course I’m white, comfortably off, and professional; all of which will have helped.)

Sweden, like Britain, is about to make its naturalisation process more difficult; but still it looks as though Britain will remain one of the most unwelcoming countries for the foreseeable future. Of course, that’s what our Rightists want; despite all the benefits that immigrants have brought over the past 400 years. (See my Britain Before Brexit, 2021, chapter 4.)

Incidentally: I once happened upon Karl Marx’s application for British citizenship about 150 years ago. The British police reported that as he had been notoriously hostile to his German king, he was unlikely to be loyal to Queen Victoria. But he was still allowed to stay. (He’s still here, of course.)

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Örebro School Shooting

Eleven dead, at an adult education centre, including the shooter, a 35-ish white man with no previous criminal record, but a history of school failure, unemployment and solitariness. Thank God he wasn’t a Muslim. (As many of his victims were.) But we need the police to look into his computer before we can surmise his motivation for sure.

This is extraordinary in Sweden. We thought it was reasonably safe here. We’re also currently getting bombs going off all over Sweden – gangland, apparently. No-one hurt.

I’m about to be interviewed by a ‘free’ Russian documentary maker (Redaktsiya) on ‘imperialism’. I guess the subject is more relevant now than it has been for many years, with both Putin and Trump reopening that can of worms.

Next day: more info: https://www.thelocal.se/20250205/orebro-campus-shooter-named-in-swedish-media. And more: https://www.thelocal.se/20250206/multiple-nationalities-among-victims-in-swedish-mass-shooting-police. So it does look like an anti-immigrant motive.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Is Trump a Fascist?

It used to be dismissed as hyperbole. Now the idea of the USA’s being – or shortly becoming – a ‘Fascist’ power is being taken seriously.

Obviously Trump is not gassing Jews, or anyone else, yet. But neither did Hitler until 1941, or Mussolini ever. Those who think that genocide is the test a regime has to pass before it can be labelled ‘Fascist’ are clearly wrong. The ‘final solution’ was the culmination of Hitler’s particular form of Fascism, not essential to it. There are other more characteristic features: including different forms of racism, irrationalism, anti-intellectualism, totalitarianism, authoritarianism, nationalism, assertive masculinism, corporatism, resentment against past national humiliations, anti-‘elitism’, anti-politics… and so on. They must all strike chords today.

As a historian, I was intending to post a blog on the comparison with Trumpism, as well as the differences. But I soon realised that this has already been done a score of times (Google Trump/Hitler comparisons); and so I won’t burden you with my take on it now. Except to say that in my judgment Trumpism is a particular form of Fascism, peculiar to America because of the late-capitalist environment in which it is being born there – vide the very Ayn-Randy and obvious ‘techno’-Fascist Elon Musk – and so not strictly comparable in every detail with the 1930s variety (in which capitalism played a lesser part); but nonetheless sharing many of the latter’s characteristics.

I was reminded of these when I recently watched the TV documentary series Hitler and the Nazis: Evil on Trial. The similarities shout out at you. Among trivial ones, it’s the narrator who compares the Berghof to Mar-a-Lago; so the series must have been made fairly recently, and with Trump in mind. The Nuremberg rallies are another obvious parallel. Then there’s the Austrian Anschluss, raising fears for present-day Canada… and so on. – I recommend the whole series, which you can get up at https://www.imdb.com/title/tt32331294/. It must raise some doubts in the minds of those who dismiss our ‘Nazi’ fears as mere left-wing scare-mongering. As of course many did in the 1930s.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Ayn Rand

Ayn Rand’s ‘philosophical novels’ are supposed to have had a great influence on the American Right, with their glorification of free enterprise and heroic male industrialists. With America now being ruled (once again) by a millionaire property developer, supported by the country’s three leading tech billionaires, and along capitalist lines (The Art of the Deal), I thought I ought to read at least one of them. I’ve tried once before with The Fountainhead, but gave up; it’s a very long and pedestrian book, and bored me stiff. I’m now fifty pages into Atlas Shrugged, and finding the same. I’ll persevere; but I may not finish it.

I imagine you’ll know about Rand: originally Alisa Zinovjevna Rosenbaum; an immigrant from Soviet Russia, whose ‘philosophy’ seems to be to be a marriage between Adam Smith and Friedrich Nietzsche.

(PS. Here’s an article on the modern-day equivalents of Rand’s fictional heroes: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ng-interactive/2025/jan/29/silicon-valley-rightwing-technofascism.)

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Manifest Destiny 2.0

Interesting historical piece by a conservative Canadian/American.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/23/opinion/trump-mckinley-populism.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

God For Harry, England and Saint George

Prince Harry’s utter vindication this morning in his High Court case against the Murdoch press (https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/prince-harry-v-murdoch-lawyers-due-back-court-after-last-gasp-deal-talks-2025-01-22/) is a rare ray of light in today’s on-going war between Good and Evil. I’ve not much time for the British royal family, least of all for Harry after the scandal of his wearing a Nazi uniform to a fancy-dress party twenty years ago (https://www.theguardian.com/media/2005/jan/13/royalsandthemedia.pressandpublishing); but to my mind he has fully made up for that with the battle he has been waging, at some risk to himself, against our over-powerful and, yes, ‘evil’, Fourth Estate. It will be interesting to see what the Sun – his main adversary – makes of it all tomorrow.

Unfortunately it won’t have as much impact as it would have done in the days when people still read newspapers, before they switched to the social media. (Of course neither is completely evil; you still have the Guardian, and this blog.) In connexion with which it was depressing – even scary – to see our social media lords and masters given second-row seats at Trump’s Inauguration; quite apart from the (allegedly) Nazi salutes that one of them gave to a rally of MAGA Republicans shortly afterwards. I think that even the twenty year-old Harry would have baulked at that.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Trump 2.0

How many self-styled ‘democracies’ allow their elected leaders to pardon convicted criminals by ‘executive action’, without reference to the ‘due process’ that applies to the rest of their people? (I’m referring of course to the roughly 1600 Capitol rioters whom Trump pardoned yesterday. Of course Biden has done the same, as outgoing President.)

The reason in America’s case may be the legacy of the colonial ties she escaped from in 1776. The new-minted USA ditched its ‘mad’ British monarch then, but not all his monarchical privileges. The American President is essentially a George III de nos jours. In certain circumstances he can do what the hell he likes. In this respect, British leaders, at least, could be said to be more democratically accountable than Trump.

I doubt, too, incidentally, whether any European rulers would be comfortable with their rich backers celebrating their electoral triumphs with Nazi (or ‘Roman’) salutes (https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/20/trump-elon-musk-salute).

But you never know what might come. I have to say I’m troubled. I’m almost grateful that, at my age, I probably won’t live to see the final victory of ‘fascism’ (or whatever), in its 21st-century guise. Looking at the signs now, that guise will probably be late-stage capitalist, and scaringly technological. Look at Trump’s government, and his rich and nerdish backers. And be afraid; very afraid.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Elected Dictators

Recent studies in both Britain and Sweden have shown that over 20% of ‘young adults’ (18-40) would ‘prefer a dictatorship to democracy’. (For Britain, see https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jan/12/one-in-five-britons-aged-18-45-prefer-unelected-leaders-to-democracy-poll-finds; for Sweden, https://www.icenews.is/2011/06/15/young-swedes-pick-dictatorship-over-democracy/.)

Today’s US Presidential inauguration, however, seems to suggest that you can have both at the same time. Trump, who was democratically elected, has said that he wants to be a dictator, albeit only ‘on day one’. His long list of over 200 ‘executive actions’, to be announced this afternoon, may reveal what he meant by this. Part of his appeal clearly lies in people’s perception of him as a ‘strong leader’, which is halfway to dictatorship. That’s ‘populism’ for you. And a majority of Americans, as well as those 20+% of young British and Swedish adults, clearly prefer this to the indecisive, short-termist, divisive and messy results that democratic systems usually turn up. Vote for the Führer you prefer. (Or, in the USA, the capitalist.) That’s squared the circle; if, that is, your idea of ‘democracy’ is that very simple one.

I’m not sure whether SvT will be covering the US Presidential inauguration, but if not I’ll be following it on my laptop, at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2L-knUrFi8. Bring out the Coors.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Swedish Citizenship (Dual)

Maybe I was over-optimistic, or simply naïve, in thinking that my dual Swedish citizenship, in which I take great comfort, was irrevocable. It is according to present Swedish law. But a Parliamentary Committee is currently discussing whether the constitution should now be amended in order to enable citizenship to be revoked (for duals only) from certain classes of citizens:

  • If they are found guilty of crimes which pose a serious threat to Sweden’s security, such as espionage, terrorism, sabotage, treason, or rebellion
  • If they are found guilty of crimes covered by the International Criminal Court, such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression 
  • If they received their citizenship on false grounds, either through supplying false documents or information or by bribing or threatening government officials.

On first reading I was (personally) reassured by this. I have no intention of committing any of those heinous crimes; am pretty sure that my original application was honest and accurate; and can’t remember offering any bribes to Migrationsverket.

Following the Committee’s debates, however (as reported in the English-language Local newspaper), it’s clear that some of its members would like to broaden its scope to include any dual citizen who ‘seriously threatens the state’s vital interests’; which of coarse is much vaguer, and more subjective. Leftists are afraid it might cover people who think like them (and me); especially if the far-Right Sverigedemokraterna ever take control. Which they might.

Quite apart from this, it’s very likely that Sweden will impose a Swedish language test on future applicants for citizenship. I have a certain sympathy for that; but it would have excluded me.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

From Your Stockholm Correspondent

I’m lucky to be living most of the time now in Sweden; always regarded as the ‘shining city on the hill’ by us old Labourites, even by those – like me – who had never visited the place, but had read about the near-perfection of its ‘social democracy’. When I started coming here in the 1990s (for other reasons), I was not disappointed; and still am not after nearly 30 years. It’s a highly civilised country, with efficient industries, excellent public services, strong trade unions, general equality, an almost universal sense of social responsibility, good and affordable health care, farmers brought into the cities with their tractors in winter to shift the snow, free university education, universal and state-funded parental (not just maternal) leave, humane prisons, clean streets, a cashless system for buying things (‘Swish’ – all you need is your mobile phone), and doctors’ prescriptions computerised – so we can get them at any Apotek. For those of us who miss ‘home’ (pathetically), there are English pubs all over, with names like the Friar Tuck, the Beefeater, and the Old Brewery, a couple of them serving Sunday roasts… I could go on. And of course we have masses of unspoilt nature, urban beauty, long warm summer days, and natives who are polite and friendly, and generally speak better English than we do.

Of course it’s not perfect. Winter’s a bit of a bugger; but houses are treble-glazed to keep us warm. The native food, although usually healthy, as you might expect here, is not always to my taste (raw herring and meatballs); but there are some excellent Indian and Thai restaurants around, and I can of course cook for us: Kajsa particularly likes my Shepherd’s Pie and Lancashire Hotpot. (And I’m getting a taste for the herring: not strictly ‘raw’, in fact, but marinated in vinegar.) There are beggars – supposedly Romanians – sitting outside tunnelbana stations. The state can seem a little intrusive – but I’ve become comfortable with that, and it helps when we’re filling out our tax forms – see the end of my 20 November post. We’re struggling just now with a minor case of misplaced bureaucracy (a parking charge; Kajsa doesn’t even own a motor-bike!); but we’ll soon sort that. The taxes are a bit higher; but only a bit, and look what we get for them! Pubs and restaurants are relatively expensive, but mainly because they pay decent wages to their staff. There are very occasional far Right demos: an anti-Fascist meeting Kajsa had helped to arrange was attacked by one of them a few weeks ago, but when their masks slipped they turned out to be adolescent boys. On the whole it’s pretty good here for most of us – apart perhaps from the Romanians. The ‘Swedish model’ seems to be working still; standing almost alone (together with the other Nordic countries) against the global neo-liberal tsunami that broke over other countries in Thatcher’s and Reagan’s time.

But ominous clouds are forming, even over this ‘shining city’ of mine. We no longer have a Social Democratic government, but a centre-Right coalition being pushed to the further Right by the relatively new ‘Sweden Democrats’ – ex-Nazis – who are close in their political philosophies to Trump, Farage, the AfD, and similar tendencies in France, Italy, Hungary and elsewhere. ‘Free’ schools – free to their students but owned by and run as businesses – are often problematical. Privatisation is creeping in other fields. State subsidies for culture and even newspapers – keeping the latter free from the right-wing bias that pervades the British press – have been drastically reduced. Sweden’s generous citizenship laws are being stiffened; if I had waited much longer to apply for it, my own (dual) nationality might not have been granted now. And on the wider political front, Sweden has just joined NATO, which she had pointedly avoided for eighty years. That may have been a good or a bad decision; but while her ‘neutrality’ lasted it had reinforced her image of difference from the rest of the world.

Today’s advance of the extreme Right – nationalism, racism, sexism and the rest – is of course a global phenomenon. I came to Sweden partly to escape it. (I call myself a ‘Brexit refugee’.) So far I remain happy with that decision. But will I feel the same about it in five years’ time (if I last that long)? The auguries are not clear.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments