Read, mark, learn and get angry.
-
Archives
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- January 2015
- January 2014
- December 2013
-
Meta
It’s not a club of one though.
It was, allegedly, Cameron who would not allow the Civil Service to prepare for the consequences of a Leave result. It was his Government which said Leave meant leaving the Single Market, when he need not have done so.
But blame must also attach to the Remainers who tried to overturn the result of a democratic referendum, including Starmer who effectively torpedoed Corbyn’s chances of winning a General Election by insisting on the Second Referendum approach. They should have accepted the result and then worked to make it viable.
So, the club of useless PMs will just grow and grow
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree that the blame should be spread around; and also that a better response to a very marginal and dodgy ‘referendum’ result would have been a compromise ‘Brexit’, keeping the ‘Common Market’ aspect of it. That, as I understand it, was Corbyn’s policy. But I don’t agree that the Referendum result should have been accepted in its entirety, when (a) the tradition internationally is that on existential questions they need to be retested to make sure of them (hence the ‘second referendum’); (b) the clear cheating and corruption that led to that result; (c) the fact that it was never made clear what people were supposed to be voting FOR; (d) the fact that it was supposed to be ‘advisory’ in any case: if not, the courts ruled, it would have had to be re-run; and (e) that people’s view were likely to change afterwards. You can’t expect people to ‘get over’ ‘losing’ in this way. Most of that, of course, goes back to Cameron.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There was never any problem for ” the British people” ( what on Earth does this actually mean…discuss..🤔) with a Common Market (although I am unsure as to how “Common” it really was…Germany certainly did rather better..it was slanted towards manufacturing, not sevices..)
And yes, I believe that was Corbyn’s original policy… badly disseminated but what else could be expected from the UK MSM? He really is rather naive for a long term politician. Perhaps that is the result of having been trashed for so many years.
I accepted, not believed, I didn’t give him much thought, what the MSM said until he became Labour leader..at which point one researches his true opinions. And I liked the Labour party being led by a real Socialist, not a Blairite. After all, that’s what they are about. And no…he is not anti-Semitic, he opposes Israel’s Palestine policies…not the same at all.
I entirely disagree with your view on the Referendum result. For better or worse, the result of a democratic vote must be accepted…within the bounds of an agreed Bill of Rights. The Referendum did not impinge on any Rights which any modern society accepts as valid.
The alternative is that no democratic vote has validity..in which case there can be no lasting democracy (which may well be the case but the UK has survived nonetheless and is acceptable to a large majority of its inhabitants).
I really don’t believe that the voters were taken in by any of the nonsense on either side…the “British” are far too cynical.
And no, it was not advisory. Every Party stated they would abide by the result…and then tried not to. So why give them themselves any legitimacy?
However I think that Merkel’s “nein” to Cameron’s request for help on “immigration” probably swung it for Leave. Being told no by the leader ( a Prussian…) of the nation which, within living memory, pioneered murder of a racial group on an industrial scale most certainly did not help. It is strange how events cast such a Long Shadow..yes, apologies for nicking the epithet…but they do.
One can only hope that common sense will prevail, on both sides, ( the EU’s attitude did not help…if it is not capable of surviving with equanimity one member leaving it should not survive at all…) but it seems to be in short supply.
Of more rather more import is, of course, the USA’s current NeoCon policy against Russia and which the UK is poodling along with..but the EU isn’t! One has to live with the neighbours..regrettably the USA has none of consequence.
LikeLike