National Independence and Cecil Rhodes

National independence, at least in modern times, is a myth – an illusion, a chimera, a lie, a Trumpism. Every country is dependent on others, including even ‘superpowers’, which depend on others being subservient to them. Imperial Britain depended on her colonies for her markets; modern America depends on the Middle East for its oil. For ‘lesser’ nations, independence is never one of the choices available to them. They must either be subservient to other, ‘greater’ powers, or bound together voluntarily in order to be able to resist their demands. That latter was the choice made by Britain when her Empire fell to pieces after the last War; which now however looks like being exchanged for the other choice – subservience to the USA – if Brexit goes through. Trump’s ludicrously gaffe-prone visit to the UK and Ireland this week makes this clear. Without a ‘free’ European market Britain will depend largely on the USA for its essential trade, which means bowing to American demands with regard to food standards, and (probably) selling off its much-prized National Health Service to American capitalist firms. Where’s the ‘independence’ in that?

No wonder Trump is so much in favour of Brexit, and so pally with our ‘hard Brexit’ politicians. Over on the other side of us, Putin also seems to be playing the Brexit card for all it’s worth, although more cleverly and subvertly. Shouldn’t that make the Brexiteers think again? Or is a status as an informal colony of the USA what they really want?

That takes me back, historically, to the turn of the twentieth century, when every clear-sighted person realised that the Empire couldn’t last for ever – Britain had just been humiliated by a bunch of rough Dutch farmers in South Africa – and that it could only be preserved by drastic means. One that was mooted was coupling up with the new emerging super-power of the twentieth century, which might be seduced into rejoining the Empire it had broken away from in 1776, but with the centre of that Empire now shifting to Washington. An odd American historian called Carol Quigley thought he perceived a great conspiracy behind this – one of the biggest and most successful of modern times – planted by the capitalist-imperialist Cecil Rhodes, by means of a secret society – the ‘Round Table’ – and scholarships given to American students to study at Oxford University to cement the ‘speclal relationship’. Bill Clinton was a ‘Rhodes Scholar’. And Trump’s favourite Brexiteers, of course, were Oxford educated. (Apart from Farage.)

QED? Of course not. I doubt whether any of our upper-class Brexiteers are aware of this. I’m sure that they’re merely misled by the superficial myth of ‘national independence’ that any imperial historian worth his salt should be able to disabuse them of. I only hope that Trump’s much publicised inanities (including that unbelievably stupid one about the Irish border) will bring them to their senses in this regard. But they may have too much invested in Brexit for that.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to National Independence and Cecil Rhodes

  1. paulusmons says:

    “Modern America depends on the middle east for its oil”. Not exactly. Have a read of this – first section in particular:

    https://www.lrb.co.uk/v41/n09/tom-stevenson/what-are-we-there-for

    Liked by 1 person

  2. kstankers5 says:

    Insightful and thought-provoking as always, Bernard! As I was reading your piece I couldn’t help thinking about cultural independence – or its lack. As you know I’m now permanently in Poland, after a lifetime (65 years) in Blighty. Poland is not strange to me – my first visit was back in 1966, the Millenium of Polish Christianity, and a momentous year for the Poles. Back then people would have given their right hand for a UK, or any Western passport and starry-eyed fascination, especially with the US, was everywhere. The occasional Hollywood film merely served to contrast the vivid, veffortless wealth of the US with the drab austerity of the Soviet Bloc. Fast forward 50 years and that myth-fuelled fascination – again mostly with the US – is still there, and at all levels of Society. PiS politicians continue to fawn uncritically over the US; they’re even contempating spending 2 billion zloty on a Military Base for the US (separate from NATO I might add), and calling it ‘Fort Trump’! Cultural hegemony, or what?!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s